Peripatric speciation

Peripatric speciation is a mode of speciation in which a new species is formed from an isolated peripheral population. [1]:105 Since peripatric speciation resembles allopatric speciation, in that populations are isolated and prevented from exchanging genes, it can often be difficult to distinguish between them. [2] Nevertheless, the primary characteristic of peripatric speciation proposes that one of the populations is much smaller than the other. The terms peripatric and peripatry are often used in biogeography, referring to organisms whose ranges are closely adjacent but do not overlap, being separated where these organisms do not occur — for example on an oceanic island compared to the mainland. Such organisms are usually closely related ( e.g. sister species); their distribution being the result of peripatric speciation. The concept of peripatric speciation was first outlined by the evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr in 1954. [3] Since then, other alternative models have been developed such as centrifugal speciation, that posits that a species' population experiences periods of geographic range expansion followed by shrinking periods, leaving behind small isolated populations on the periphery of the main population. Other models have involved the effects of sexual selection on limited population sizes. Other related models of peripherally isolated populations based on chromosomal rearrangements have been developed such as budding speciation and quantum speciation. The existence of peripatric speciation is supported by and observational evidence and laboratory experiments. [1]:106 Scientists observing the patterns of a species biogeographic distribution and its phylogenetic relationships are able to reconstruct the historical process by which they diverged. Further, oceanic islands are often the subject of peripatric speciation research due to their isolated habitats — with the Hawaiian Islands widely represented in much of the scientific literature.

The concept of peripatric speciation was first outlined by the evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr in 1954. [3]Since then, other alternative models have been developed such as centrifugal speciation, that posits that a species' population experiences periods of geographic range expansion followed by shrinking periods, leaving behind small isolated populations on the periphery of the main population.Other models have involved the effects of sexual selection on limited population sizes.Other related models of peripherally isolated populations based on chromosomal rearrangements have been developed such as budding speciation and quantum speciation.
The existence of peripatric speciation is supported by observational evidence and laboratory experiments. [1]:106 Scientists observing the patterns of a species biogeographic distribution and its phylogenetic relationships are able to reconstruct the historical process by which they diverged.Further, oceanic islands are often the subject of peripatric speciation research due to their isolated habitats-with the Hawaiian Islands widely represented in much of the scientific literature.

History
Main article: History of speciation Peripatric speciation was originally proposed by Ernst Mayr in 1954, [3] and fully theoretically modeled in 1982. [4]It is related to the founder effect, where small living populations may undergo selection bottlenecks. [5]The founder effect is based on models that suggest peripatric speciation can occur by the interaction of selection and genetic drift, [1]:106 which may play a significant role. [6]Mayr first conceived of the idea by his observations of kingfisher populations in New Guinea and its surrounding islands. [1]:389 Tanysiptera galatea was largely uniform in morphology on the mainland, but the populations on the surrounding islands differed significantly-referring to this pattern as "peripatric". [1]:389 This same pattern was observed by many of Mayr's contemporaries at the time such as by E. B. Ford's studies of Maniola jurtina. [7]:522 Around the same time, the botanist Verne Grant developed a model of quantum speciation very similar to Mayr's model in the context of plants. [8] what has been called Mayr's genetic revolutions, he postulated that genetic drift played the primary role that resulted in this pattern. [1]:389 Seeing that a species cohesion is maintained by conservative forces such as epistasis and the slow pace of the spread of favorable alleles in a large population (based heavily on J. B. S. Haldane's calculations), he reasoned that speciation could only take place in which a population bottleneck occurred. [1]:389 A small, isolated, founder population could be established on an island for example.Containing less genetic variation from the main population, shifts in allele frequencies may occur from different selection pressures. [1]:390 This leads to further changes in the network of linked loci, driving a cascade of genetic change, or a "genetic revolution"-a large-scale reorganization of the entire genome of the peripheral population. [1]: 391 Mayr did recognize that the chances of success were incredibly low and that extinction was likely; though noting that some examples of successful founder populations existed at the time. [7]:522 Shortly after Mayr, William Louis Brown, Jr. proposed an alternative model of peripatric speciation in 1957 called centrifugal speciation.

Peripatric
Peripatric speciation models are identical to models of vicariance (allopatric speciation). [1]:105 Requiring both geographic separation and time, speciation can result as a predictable byproduct. [12]Peripatry can be distinguished from allopatric speciation by three key features: [1]:105 • The size of the isolated population • Strong selection caused by the dispersal and colonization of novel environments • The effects of genetic drift on small populations.
The size of a population is important because individuals colonizing a new habitat likely contain only a small sample of the genetic variation of the original population.This promotes divergence due to strong selective pressures, leading to the rapid fixation of an allele within the descendant population.This gives rise to the potential for genetic incompatibilities to evolve.These incompatibilities cause reproductive isolation, giving rise to-sometimes rapid-speciation events. [1]:105 Furthermore, two important predictions are invoked, namely that geological or climactic changes cause populations to become locally fragmented (or regionally when considering allopatric speciation), and that an isolated population's reproductive traits evolve enough as to prevent interbreeding upon potential secondary contact. [13]The role of genetic drift and founder effects in speciation remains controversial and unresolved. [1]:394- 396 The peripatric model results in, what have been called, progenitor-derivative species pairs, whereby the derivative species (the peripherally isolated population)geographically and genetically isolated from the progenitor species-diverges. [14]A specific phylogenetic signature results from this mode of speciation: the geographically widespread progenitor species becomes paraphyletic (thereby becoming a paraspecies), with re spect to the derivative species (the peripheral isolate). [1]:470 The concept of a paraspecies is therefore a logical consequence of the evolutionary species con-cept, by which one species gives rise to a daughter species. [15]It is thought that the character traits of the peripherally isolated species become apomorphic, while the central population remains pleisomorphic. [16]dern cladistic methods have developed definitions that have incidentally removed derivative species by defining clades in a way that assumes that when a speciation event occurs, the original species no longer exists, while two new species arise; this is not the case in peripatric speciation. [8]Mayr warned against this, as it causes a species to lose their classification status. [17]oren H. Rieseberg and Luc Brouillet recognized the same dilemma in plant classification. [18]antum and budding speciation The botanist Verne Grant proposed the term quantum speciation that combined the ideas of J. T. Gulick (his observation of the variation of species in semi-isolation), Sewall Wright (his models of genetic drift), Mayr (both his peripatric and genetic revolution models), and George Gaylord Simpson (his development of the idea of quantum evolution). [19]:114 Quantum speciation is a rapid process with large genotypic or phenotypic effects, whereby a new, cross-fertilizing plant species buds off from a larger population as a semi-isolated peripheral population. [20][19]:114 Interbreeding and genetic drift takes place due to the reduced population size, driving changes to the genome that would most likely result in extinction (due to low adaptive value). [19]:115 In rare instances, chromosomal traits with adaptive value may arise, resulting in the origin of a new, derivative species. [8][21]Evidence for the occurrence of this type of speciation has been found in several plant species pairs: Layia discoidea and L. glandulosa, Clarkia lingulata and C. biloba, and Stephanomeria malheurensis and S. exigua ssp.coronaria. [8]closely related model of peripatric speciation is called budding speciation-largely applied in the context of plant speciation. [22]The budding process, where a new species originates at the margins of an ancestral range, is thought to be common in plants [22] -especially in progenitor-derivative species pairs. [23]ntrifugal speciation William Louis Brown, Jr. proposed an alternative model of peripatric speciation in 1957 called centrifugal speciation.This model contrasts with peripatric speciation by virtue of the origin of the genetic novelty that leads to reproductive isolation. [24]A population of a species experiences periods of geographic range expansion followed by periods of contraction.During the contraction phase, fragments of the population become isolated as small refugial populations on the periphery of the central population.Because of the large size and potentially greater genetic variation within the central population, mutations arise more readily.These mutations are left in the isolated peripheral populations, whereby, promoting reproductive isolation.Consequently, Brown suggested that during another expansion phase, the central population would overwhelm the peripheral populations, hindering speciation.However, if the species finds a specialized ecological niche, the two may coexist. [25][26]The phylogenetic signature of this model is that the central population becomes derived, while the peripheral isolates (in this case, the progenitors) become paraphyletic. [16]-the reverse of the general model.In contrast to centrifugal speciation, peripatric speciation has sometimes been referred to as centripetal speciation (see figures 1 and 2 for a contrast). [27]Despite this, Brown cited a wealth of evidence to support his model, of which has not yet been refuted. [25]romyscus polionotus and P. melanotis (the peripherally isolated species from the central population of P. maniculatus) arose via the centrifugal speciation model. [29]Centrifugal speciation may have taken place in tree kangaroos, South American frogs (Ceratophrys), shrews (Crocidura), and primates (Presbytis melalophos). [28]John C. Briggs associates centrifugal speciation with centers of origin, contending that the centrifugal model is better supported by the data, citing species patterns from the proposed 'center of origin' within the Indo-West Pacific [28] Kaneshiro model When a sexual species experiences a population bottle neck-that is, when the genetic variation is reduced due to small population size-mating discrimination among females may be altered by the decrease in courtship behaviors of males. [11]Sexual selection pressures may become weakened by this in an isolated peripheral population, and as a by-product of the altered mating recognition system, secondary sexual traits may appear. [9]ventually, a growth in population size paired with novel female mate preferences will give rise to reproductive isolation from the main population-thereby completing the peripatric speciation process. [10]Support for this model comes from experiments and observation of species that exhibit asymmetric mating patterns such as the Hawaiian Drosophila species [30][31] or the Hawaiian cricket Laupala. [32]However, this model has not been entirely supported by experiments, and therefore, it may not represent a plausible process of peripatric speciation that takes place in nature. [11]gure 2 | In the Kaneshiro model, a sample of a larger population results in an isolated population with less males containing attractive traits.Over time, choosy females are selected against as the population increases.Sexual selection drives new traits to arise (green), reproductively isolating the new population from the old one (blue). [11]vidence See also: Allopatric speciation § Observational evidence Observational evidence from nature and laboratory experiments support the occurrence of peripatric speciation.Islands and archipelagos are often the subject of speciation studies in that they represent isolated populations of organisms.Island species provide direct evidence of speciation occurring peripatrically in such that, "the presence of endemic species on oceanic islands whose closest relatives inhabit a nearby continent" must have originated by a colonization event. [1]:106-107 Comparative phylogeography of archipelagos shows consistent patterns of sequential colonization and speciation along island chains, most notably on the Azores islands, Canary Islands, Society Islands, Marquesas Islands, Galápagos Islands, Austral Islands, and the Hawaiian Islands-all of which express geological patterns of spatial isolation and, in some cases, linear arrangement. [33]Peripatric speciation also occurs on continents, as isolation of small populations can occur through various geographic and dispersion events.Laboratory studies have been conducted where populations of Drosophila, for example, are separated from one another and evolve in reproductive isolation.

Hawaiian archipelago
Drosophila species on the Hawaiian archipelago have helped researchers understand speciation processes in great detail.It is well established that Drosophila has undergone an adaptive radiation into hundreds of endemic species on the Hawaiian island chain; [1]:107 [34] originating from a single common ancestor (supported from molecular analysis). [35]Studies consistently find that colonization of each island occurred from older to younger islands, and in Drosophila, speciating peripatrically at least fifty percent of the time. [1]:108 In conjunction with Drosophila, Hawaiian lobeliads (Cyanea) have also undergone an adaptive radiation, with upwards of twenty-seven percent of extant species arising after new island colonization-exemplifying peripatric speciation-once again, occurring in the old-to-young island direction. [36][37][38]her endemic species in Hawaii also provide evidence of peripatric speciation such as the endemic flightless crickets (Laupala).It has been estimated that, "17 species out of 36 well-studied cases of [Laupala] speciation were peripatric". [1]:108 [39] Plant species in genera's such as Dubautia, Wilkesia, and Argyroxiphium have also radiated along the archipelago. [40]Other animals besides insects show this same pattern such as the Hawaiian amber snail (Succinea caduca), [41] and 'Elepaio flycatchers (Chasiempis). [42]tragnatha spiders have also speciated peripatrically on the Hawaiian islands, [43][44] Numerous arthropods have been documented existing in patterns consistent with the geologic evolution of the island chain, in such that, phylogenetic reconstructions find younger species inhabiting the geologically younger islands and older species inhabiting the older islands [45] (or in some cases, ancestors date back to when islands currently below sea level were exposed).Spiders such as those from the genus Orsonwelles exhibit patterns compatible with the old-to-young geology. [46]Other endemic genera such as Argyrodes have been shown to have speciated along the island chain. [47]Pagiopalus, Pedinopistha, and part of the Thomisidae family have adaptively radiated along the island chain, [48] as well as the Lycosidae family of wolf spiders. [49]host of other Hawaiian endemic arthropod species and genera have had their speciation and phylogeographical patterns studied: the Drosophila grimshawi species complex, [50] damselflies (Megalagrion xanthomelas and Megalagrion pacificum), [51] Doryonychus raptor, Littorophiloscia hawaiiensis, Anax strenuus, Nesogonia blackburni, Theridion grallator, [52] Vanessa tameamea, Hyalopeplus pellucidus, Coleotichus blackburniae, Labula, Hawaiioscia, Banza (in the Tettigoniidae family), Caconemobius, Eupethicea, Ptycta, Megalagrion, Prognathogryllus, Nesosydne, Cephalops, Trupanea, and the tribe Platynini-all suggesting repeated radiations among the islands.[53]

Other islands
Phylogenetic studies of a species of crab spider (Misumenops rapaensis) in the genus Thomisidae located on the Austral Islands have established the, "sequential colonization of [the] lineage down the Austral archipelago toward younger islands".M. rapaensis has been traditionally thought of as a single species; whereas this particular study found distinct genetic differences corresponding to the sequential age of the islands. [54] Other members of the same genus have also arisen by single colonization events between the islands. [57][58]

Species patterns on continents
The occurrence of peripatry on continents is more difficult to detect due to the possibility of vicariant explanations being equally likely. [1]:110 However, studies concerning the Californian plant species Clarkia bilobaand C. lingulata strongly suggest a peripatric origin. [59]In addition, a great deal of research has been conducted on several species of land snails involving chirality that suggests peripatry (with some authors noting other possible interpretations). [1]:111 The chestnut-tailed antbird Sciaphylax hemimelaena (formerly called Myrmeciza hemimelaena) is located within the Noel Kempff Mercado National Park (Serrania de Huanchaca) in Bolivia.Within this region exists a forest fragment estimated to have been isolated for 1000-3000 years.The population of S. hemimelaena antbirds that reside in the isolated patch express significant song divergence; thought to be an "early step" in the process of peripatric speciation.Further, peripheral isolation "may partly explain the dramatic diversification of suboscines in Amazonia". [13]e montane spiny throated reed frog species complex (genus: Hyperolius) originated through occurrences of peripatric speciation events.Lucinda P. Lawson maintains that the species' geographic ranges within the Eastern Afromontane Biodiversity Hotspot support a peripatric model that is driving speciation; suggesting that this mode of speciation may play a significant role in "highly fragmented ecosystems". [2] a study of the phylogeny and biogeography of the land snail genus Monacha, the species M. ciscaucasica is thought to have speciated peripatrically from a population of M. roseni.In addition, M. claussi consists of a small population located on the peripheral of the much larger range of M. subcarthusiana suggesting that it also arose by peripatric speciation. [60]d spruce (Picea rubens) has arisen from an isolated population of black spruce (Picea mariana).During the Pleistocene, a population of black spruce became geographically isolated, likely due to glaciation.The geographic range of the black spruce is much larger than the red spruce.The red spruce has significantly lower genetic diversity in both its nuclear DNA and its mitochondrial DNA than the black spruce. [61][62] It is thought that the entire Picea genus in North America has been diversified by the process of peripatric speciation, as numerous pairs of closely related species in the genus have smaller southern population ranges; and those with overlapping ranges often exhibit weak reproductive isolation. [66][62]ing a phylogeographic approach paired with ecological niche models (i.e.prediction and identification of expansion and contraction species ranges into suitable habitats based on current ecological niches, correlated with fossil and molecular data), researchers found that the prairie dog species Cynomys mexicanus speciated peripatrically from Cynomys ludovicianus approximately 230,000 years ago.North American glacial cycles promoted range expansion and contraction of the prairie dogs, leading to the isolation of a relic population in a refugium located in the present day Coahuila, Mexico. [67]his distribution and paleobiogeographic pattern correlates with other species expressing similar biographic range patterns [67] such as with the Sorex cinereus complex. [68]

See also: Laboratory experiments of speciation
Laboratory studies have been conducted in an attempt to replicate peripatric speciation in a controlled setting.Jerry Coyne and H. Allen Orr in Speciation suggest that most laboratory studies of allopatric speciation are also examples of peripatric speciation due to their small population sizes and the inevitable divergent selection that they undergo. [1]:106 Much of the laboratory research concerning peripatry is inextricably linked to founder effect research.Coyne and Orr conclude that selection's role in speciation is well established, 1 1979 [69] Drosophila silvestris 1 1980 [70] Drosophila pseudoobscura 8 1985 [71] Drosophila simulans 8 1985 [72] Musca domestica 6 1991 [73] Drosophila pseudoobscura 42 1993 [74] Drosophila melanogaster 50 1998 [75] Drosophila melanogaster 19; 19 1999 [76] Drosophila grimshawi 1 N/A [11] Table 1 | A non-exhaustive table of laboratory experiments focused explicitly on peripatric speciation.Most of the studies also conducted experiments on vicariant speciation as well.The "replicates" column signifies the number of lines used in the experiment-that is, how many independent populations were used (not the population size or the number of generations performed). [11]hereas genetic drift's role is unsupported by experimental and field data-suggesting that founder-effect speciation does not occur. [1]:410 Nevertheless, a great deal of research has been conducted on the matter, and one study conducted involving populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura found evidence of isolation after a single bottleneck. [77][78]

Figure 1 |
Figure 1 | Diagrams representing the process of peripatric and centrifugal speciation.A) In peripatry, a small population becomes isolated on the periphery of the central population evolving reproductive isolation (blue) due to reduced gene flow.B) In centrifugal speciation, an original population (green) range expands and contracts, leaving an isolated fragment population behind.The central population (changed to blue) evolves reproductive isolation in contrast to peripatry.

Figure 3 |
Figure 3 | A) Colonization events of species from the genus Cyanea (green) and species from the genus Drosophila (blue) on the Hawaiian island chain.Islands age from left to right, (Kauai being the oldest and Hawaii being the youngest).Speciation arises peripatrically as they spatiotemporally colonize new islands along the chain.Lighter blue and green indicate colonization in the reverse direction from young-to-old.B) A map of the Hawaiian archipelago showing the colonization routes of Theridion grallatorsuperimposed.Purple lines indicate colonization occurring in conjunction with island age where light purple indicates backwards colonization.T. grallatoris not present on Kauai or Niihau so colonization may have occurred from there, or the nearest continent.C)The sequential colonization and speciation of the 'Elepaio subspecies along the Hawaiian island chain.

Figure 4 |
Figure 4 | A) The southern chestnut-tailed antbird, Sciaphylax hemimelaena B) Satellite image of the Noel Kempff Mercado National Park (outlined in green) in Bolivia, South America.The white arrow indicates the location of the isolated forest fragment.A) Hector Bottai, CC-BY-SA 3.0